Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nutr Res. 2012 Dec 27;33(1):18–26. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2012.11.009

Table 4. The associations between yogurt consumption and levels of metabolic factors.

Nonconsumers (n = 3016) Consumers (n = 3510) Consumers Ptrendb Pcon vs non-conc

Low-intake groupa (n = 1758) High-intake groupa (n = 1752)
Median energy contribution from yogurt (%kcal) 0 2.07 1.11 5.70
Total cholesterol (mg/dL) Model 1d 196.0 (194.4, 197.7)e 194.8 (193.1, 196.5) 195.4 (193.4, 197.4) 194.2 (192.1, 196.3) .11 .21
Model 2d 194.9 (193.2, 196.6) 194.8 (193.2, 196.5) 195.0 (192.9, 197.0) 194.7 (192.6, 196.8) .85 .97
Model 3d 194.9 (193.2, 196.6) 195.0 (193.2, 196.6) 195.0 (192.9, 197.0) 195.0 (192.9, 197.1) .97 .97
HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) Model 1 53.0 (52.2, 53.7) 53.2 (52.5, 53.9) 53.0 (52.1, 53.8) 53.4 (52.6, 54.3) .29 .53
Model 2 53.3 (52.5, 54.0) 53.2 (52.5, 53.9) 53.1 (52.3, 53.3) 53.3 (52.4, 54.2) .91 .85
Model 3 53.2 (52.5, 53.8) 53.0 (52.3, 53.7) 53.1 (52.3, 53.9) 52.9 (52.1, 53.7) .53 .70
Triglycerides (mg/dL)f Model 1 111.2 (108.4, 114.0) 107.0 (104.2, 109.8) 109.5 (106.1, 113.0) 104.3 (101.0, 107.7) <.001 .01
Model 2 109.4 (106.6, 112.3) 107.1 (104.3, 109.9) 108.8 (105.5, 112.3) 105.1 (101.8, 108.6) .02 .16
Model 3 109.9 (107.2, 112.6) 107.8 (105.2, 110.6) 108.8 (105.6, 112.1) 106.8 (103.5, 110.1) .10 .20
Glucose (mg/dL)f Model 1 98.7 (98.0, 99.5) 97.2 (96.5, 97.9) 97.9 (97.0, 98.7) 96.5 (95.7, 97.4) <.001 <.001
Model 2 98.2 (97.5, 99.0) 97.3 (96.6, 98.0) 97.8 (96.9, 98.6) 96.8 (95.9, 97.6) .002 .02
Model 3 98.4 (97.7, 99.1) 97.5 (96.8, 98.2) 97.8 (96.9, 98.6) 97.1 (96.3, 98.0) .01 .02
Insulin (pmol/L)f Model 1 83.8 (82.2, 85.4) 81.4 (79.9, 82.9) 83.2 (81.4, 85.1) 79.4 (77.6, 81.3) <.001 .009
Model 2 82.3 (80.7, 83.9) 81.5 (80.0, 83.1) 82.8 (81.0, 84.6) 80.1 (78.3, 82.0) .02 .42
Model 3 82.8 (81.4, 84.2) 82.1 (80.8, 83.4) 82.8 (81.2, 84.3) 81.4 (79.8, 83.1) .12 .40
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) Model 1 121.7 (121.0, 122.3) 120.2 (119.5, 120.9) 120.5 (119.7, 121.3) 119.8 (118.9, 120.7) <.001 <.001
Model 2 121.3 (120.6, 122.0) 120.2 (119.5, 120.9) 120.4 (119.6, 121.2) 120.0 (119.1, 120.9) .03 .01
Model 3 121.3 (120.6, 122.0) 120.4 (119.7, 121.0) 120.4 (119.6, 121.2) 120.3 (119.5, 121.2) .12 .02
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) Model 1 75.1 (74.6, 75.5) 74.4 (74.0, 74.9) 74.6 (74.1, 75.1) 74.2 (73.7, 74.8) .01 .02
Model 2 74.7 (74.2, 75.1) 74.4 (74.0, 74.9) 74.5 (73.9, 75.0) 74.4 (73.8, 75.0) .43 .34
Model 3 74.7 (74.3, 75.2) 74.6 (74.1, 75.0) 74.5 (74.0, 75.0) 74.6 (74.1, 75.2) .91 .49
HOMA-IRf Model 1 3.42 (3.34, 3.50) 3.27 (3.20, 3.35) 3.37 (3.28, 3.45) 3.17 (3.09, 3.27) <.001 .001
Model 2 3.34 (3.26, 3.42) 3.28 (3.21, 3.36) 3.35 (3.26, 3.43) 3.21 (3.12, 3.30) .006 .19
Model 3 3.37 (3.30, 3.43) 3.31 (3.25, 3.37) 3.34 (3.27, 3.42) 3.28 (3.20, 3.36) .04 .15
a

Low-intake and high-intake groups were generated using a cut point of 2.07%kcal from yogurt.

b

P values for testing the linear trends across yogurt consumption (percentage of energy contribution) groups.

c

P values for testing the differences between yogurt consumers and nonconsumers.

d

Model 1: adjusted for age, sex, PAI score, total energy intake, and smoking status. Model 2: model 1 + DGAI score and the use of supplements. Model 3: model 2 + BMI.

e

Mean (95% CI) for all such values;

f

Triglycerides, glucose, insulin, and HOMA-IR are presented in geometric means (95% CI).