Table 2. Diversity of populations and sub-populations.
| Sampling location | n | MLGs | # Alleles/locus | HE | HO | FIS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Arbor, MI (AA) | 13 | 11 | 5.1 | 0.620 | 0.566 | 0.087a |
| Lansing, MI (LS) | 8 | 8 | 4.1 | 0.549 | 0.533 | 0.029 |
| Grand Valley, MI (GV) | 8 | 8 | 4.7 | 0.684 | 0.628 | 0.081 |
| LSU Campus, LA (LSU) | 16 | 15 | 5.6 | 0.637 | 0.611 | 0.041a |
| Oak Plantation, LA (OP) | 13 | 9 | 4.0 | 0.639 | 0.571 | 0.105 |
| Baton Rouge Farm, LA (FARM) | 14 | 8 | 4.1 | 0.629 | 0.625 | 0.006 |
| Michigan | 29 | 27 | 7.1 | 0.619 | 0.575 | 0.071a |
| Louisiana | 43 | 32 | 6.7 | 0.645 | 0.604 | 0.064a |
Abbreviations: FIS, inbreeding coefficient; HE, expected heterozygosity; HO, observed heterozygosity; MLGs, number of multi-locus genotypes; n, number of samples.
a
Significant heterozygote deficit at P<0.05.