Table 2.

Comparison of the top 10 SNPs across different analyses in terms of p-values, coefficients and position

CHR	SNP	Minor Allele	MAF	Final residual model			Q1 vs. Q5 analysis			Q1 vs. Q2/Q3/Q4 analysis			Q5 vs. Q2/Q3/Q4 analysis
				β	p-value	Position	β	p-value	Position	β	p-value	Position	β	p-value	Position
14	rs3748348	A	0.40	0.28	2.12×10−7	1	0.37	5.86×10−7	1	0.78	0.0781	40579	0.55	2.48×10−5	7
2	rs1609361	C	0.44	0.25	2.10×10−6	2	0.4	6.87×10−7	2	0.68	0.0057	2758	0.62	0.0005	248
10	rs7897741	C	0.12	−0.36	5.91×10−6	3	2.92	0.0001	31	1.71	0.0040	1914	1.59	0.0530	28134
2	rs16987794	C	0.14	0.32	1.10×10−5	4	0.48	0.0022	1004	0.71	0.1108	58308	0.65	0.0125	6331
8	rs13251704	G	0.24	−0.27	1.16×10−5	5	1.84	0.0028	1272	1.35	0.0524	27066	1.35	0.0766	40961
2	rs2698011	A	0.44	0.23	1.29×10−5	6	0.43	4.12×10−6	3	0.68	0.0066	3236	0.66	0.0023	1177
2	rs2715077	T	0.44	0.23	1.37×10−5	7	0.44	6.46×10−6	5	0.71	0.0155	7787	0.64	0.0012	626
12	rs7306879	G	0.27	−0.25	1.42×10−5	8	2.17	8.63×10−5	24	1.27	0.0895	46725	1.65	0.0026	1335
2	rs2698029	A	0.44	0.23	1.44×10−5	9	0.44	6.44×10−6	4	0.72	0.0182	9135	0.64	0.0010	501
4	rs4865353	C	0.44	0.23	2.23×10−5	10	0.57	0.0015	600	0.92	0.5669	302273	0.62	0.0006	314