Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biomaterials. 2013 Feb 9;34(13):3459–3466. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.069

Table 1.

Nanocarrier Size
(nm)
Zeta
potential
(mv)
Antibodies per
nanocarrier
Nanocarriers
bound per
cella
Single Targeting:
Anti-ICAM 219±4.54 −9.37±0.47 273±37.0 49.9±9.80
Anti-TfR-8D3 265±27.9 −14.5±3.4 185±2.37 31.6±2.28
Anti-TfR-R17 235±15.1 −15.9±1.63 220±6.27 3.71±0.61
Combined Targeting:
Anti-TfR-R17/8D3 258±12.2 −14.5±3.67 8D3:
115±0.94
R17:
140±7.22
11.9±0.76
Anti-TfR-R17/IgG 251±13.2 −9.50±0.28 R17:
154±0.87
IgG:
136±0.31
6.72±1.63
Anti-TfR-8D3/IgG 255±40.0 −12.9±3.89 8D3:
98.5±4.02
IgG:
152±9.74
14.7±1.16
Anti-ICAM/anti-TfR (clone R17) 216±11.1 −11.6±0.14 Anti-ICAM:
132±12.4
Anti-TfR:
145±9.72
21.0±4.12
Anti-ICAM/IgG 240±17.9 −9.02±0.34 Anti-ICAM:
124±24.5
IgG
139±2.41
16.6±2.50

Data are Mean ± S.E.M.; Ab = antibody; N/A = not applicable;

a

p<0.05 compared to control IgG NCs, in all cases (by Student’s t-test).