Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 27;97(4):698–705. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.050120

TABLE 6.

HRs (95% CIs) of CAD according to quintiles of dietary TFAs (from FFQs)1

Quintile of dietary TFA (g/d) No. of cases/person-years Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Q1 (ref): 0.88 (0.02, 1.13) 331/36,911 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q2: 1.35 (1.14, 1.52) 308/36,567 0.94 (0.81, 1.10) 0.92 (0.78, 1.07) 0.91 (0.78, 1.07)
Q3: 1.70 (1.53, 1.86) 299/36,391 0.90 (0.77, 1.05) 0.87 (0.74, 1.01) 0.86 (0.74, 1.01)
Q4: 2.05 (1.87, 2.27) 327/35,569 1.00 (0.86, 1.17) 0.94 (0.81, 1.10) 0.94 (0.81, 1.10)
Q5: 2.61 (2.28, 6.10) 306/34,894 0.95 (0.81, 1.10) 0.87 (0.74, 1.02) 0.86 (0.73, 1.01)
P-trend 0.73 0.17 0.13
Modeled as continuous variable2 0.99 (0.94, 1.04) 0.96 (0.92, 1.02) 0.96 (0.91, 1.01)
1

Quintile values are medians; ranges in parentheses. Number of subjects per model: model 1, 18,750; model 2, 18,321; and model 3, 18,302. Model 1 adjusted for age; model 2 adjusted as for model 1 plus additionally adjusted for smoking, alcohol, exercise, and BMI; model 3 adjusted as for model 2 plus additionally adjusted for diabetes and atrial fibrillation. Analyses were performed by using proportional hazards regression. CAD, coronary artery disease; FFQ, food-frequency questionnaire; Q, quintile; ref, reference; TFA, trans fatty acid.

2

ORs per SD increase in dietary TFAs (0.69 g/d).