TABLE 4.
Studies that examined the effects of enhancing memory on later intake
| Authors | Participants and exclusion criteria | Study type and schedule | Food intake measure | Experimental conditions |
| Higgs et al, 2002 (10)Experiment 1 | n = 20 | Between-subjects design; single experimental session | Ad libitum snack intake measured in afternoon laboratory session | 2 conditions: before snack eating participants instructed to write about lunch food eaten earlier in day (memory recall) or instructed to write about anything (control) |
| Undergraduate female university students | ||||
| Mean age = not reported | ||||
| Mean BMI = not reported | ||||
| Eligibility = no restrained eaters | ||||
| Higgs et al, 2002 (10)Experiment 2 | n = 23 | Between-subjects design; single experimental session | Ad libitum snack intake measured in afternoon laboratory session | 3 conditions: before snack eating participants instructed to write about lunch food eaten earlier in day (memory recall), lunch food eaten the previous day (control), or about anything (control) |
| Undergraduate female university students | ||||
| Mean age = not reported | ||||
| Mean BMI = not reported | ||||
| Eligibility = no restrained eaters | ||||
| Higgs et al, 2008 (32)Experiment 1 | n = 14 | Repeated-measures design; 2 experimental sessions with 3–7 d between sessions | Ad libitum snack intake measured in afternoon laboratory session | 2 conditions: prior to snack eating participants instructed to write about lunch food eaten earlier in day (memory recall) or lunch food eaten on the previous day (control) |
| Undergraduate male university students | ||||
| Mean age = 21 y | ||||
| Mean BMI = 22.5 kg/m2 | ||||
| Eligibility = no diabetes, food allergies, cigarette smoking, BMI outside normal range | ||||
| Higgs et al, 2008 (32)Experiment 2 | n = 73 | Between-subjects design; single experimental session | Ad libitum snack intake measured in afternoon laboratory session | 2 conditions: prior to snack eating participants instructed to write about lunch food eaten earlier in day (memory recall) or lunch food eaten the previous day (control); additional factor of trait eating disinhibition of participants (high or low) was examined |
| Undergraduate female university students | ||||
| Mean age = 20 y | ||||
| Mean BMI = 21 kg/m2 | ||||
| Eligibility = no diabetes, food allergies, cigarette smoking, dislike of test food, BMI outside normal range | ||||
| Higgs et al, 2008 (32)Experiment 3 | n = 46 | Mixed design; 2 experimental sessions attended on separate days: on 1 day 1 h after consumption of set lunch, on other day 3 h after consumption of set lunch; sessions occurred on separate days, 3–7 d apart | Ad libitum snack intake measured in afternoon laboratory session | 2 conditions: before afternoon snack eating in sessions participants instructed to write about lunch food eaten earlier in day (memory recall), or journey to campus (control); additional factor = trait eating disinhibition of participants (high or low) |
| Undergraduate female university students | ||||
| Mean age = 22 y | ||||
| Mean BMI = 22.0 kg/m2 | ||||
| Eligibility = no diabetes, food allergies, cigarette smoking, BMI outside normal range, nonhabitual breakfast eaters | ||||
| Higgs and Donohoe, 2011 (33) | n = 29 | Between-subjects design; experimental session 2 h after consumption of fixed lunch in lunch session | Ad libitum laboratory afternoon snack intake measured in second session | 3 conditions: lunch eaten with audio instructions to focus on food (enhanced memory condition), reading newspaper about food (control for food thoughts), or eating alone (control) |
| Undergraduate female university students | ||||
| Mean age = 20 y | ||||
| Mean BMI = 23 kg/m2 | ||||
| Eligibility = not reported |