Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 29;17(3):859–866. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0765-6

Table 5.

Direct restorations provided per year in SDA, SDA plus RDP and CDA subjects per tooth for upper and lower jaw (mean number (SD)) (third molars excluded)

Jaw Region SDA (n = 23) SDA plus RDP (n = 13) CDA (n = 23) Comparison between SDA and SDA plus RDP Comparison between SDA and CDA
Effect p value 95 % CI Effect p value 95 % CI
Upper Anterior 0.074 (0.049) 0.073 (0.049) 0.034 (0.046) 0.002 0.922 (−0.033, 0.037) 0.034 0.025 (0.005, 0.064)
Premolar 0.062 (0.041) 0.038 (0.032) 0.042 (0.029) 0.024 0.077 (−0.003, 0.051) 0.019 0.098 (0.004, 0.041)
Molar 0.025 (0.032)a 0.036 (0.034)b 0.053 (0.036) −0.013 0.231 (−0.035, 0.009) −0.025 0.021 (−0.047, 0.004)
Lower Anterior 0.019 (0.026) 0.031 (0.026) 0.002 (0.003) −0.010 0.247 (−0.027, 0.007) 0.012 0.022 (0.002, 0.022)
Premolar 0.055 (0.035) 0.056 (0.037) 0.045 (0.038) 0.000 0.976 (−0.026, 0.025) 0.014 0.207 (−0.008, 0.037)
Molar 0.011 (0.020)c 0.005 (0.009)d 0.056 (0.027) 0.008 0.147 (−0.003, 0.019) −0.049 0.001 (−0.064, 0.034)

Effect, p value and 95 % CI are corrected for age. For the molar region, only SDA subjects having molars at baseline were included

a n = 18

b n = 13

c n = 8

d n = 5