Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 20;39(4):612–619. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2793-8

Table 3.

Microcirculatory variables in response to fluid challenge

Variable All (n = 50) Low MFI (n = 33) High MFI (n = 17)
Baseline FC Baseline FC Baseline FC
MFI s 2.5 (2.3–2.8) 2.7 (2.4–2.8) 2.3 (2.0–2.5) 2.5 (2.1–2.8) 2.8 (2.8–2.9) 2.8 (2.7–3)
MFI l 3 (2.9–3) 3 (3–3) 3 (2.9–3) 3 (3–3) 3 (2.9–3) 3 (3–3)
Het MFI 0.3 (0.1–0.3) 0.2 (0.1–0.3) 0.3 (0.2–0.5) 0.3 (0.1–0.4) 0.2 (0.1–0.2) 0.2 (0.1–0.3)
PPV s (%) 90 (86–93) 91 (89–95) 88 (84–91) 91 (84–94) 94 (92–95) 94 (91–96)
TVD s, mm/mm2 29 (27–34) 31 (26–34) 30 (27–34) 31 (26–36) 27 (25–32) 28 (23–32)
PVD s, 1/mm 14 (12–17) 15 (13–18) 14 (12–17) 16 (13–18) 15 (14–16) 15 (12–17)

MFI s microvascular flow index small vessels (<20 μm), MFI l microvascular flow index large vessels (≥20 μm), Het MFI coefficient of MFI s variation, PPV s percentage of perfused small vessels, TVD s total vessel density small vessels, PVD s perfused vessel density small vessels, low MFI microvascular flow index <2.6, high MFI microvascular flow index ≥2.6, FC fluid challenge. All data presented as median (IQR). †  p ≤ 0.005 in comparison with baseline