Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 26;7:98. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00098

Table 2.

Contrast analysis of structural covariance network trajectories.

Network Contrast x y z Region BA Voxel size maxT
DMN (R ANG) Y > M 27 65 1 R PFC 10 181 4.97
Y > O −3 −10 40 L PCC 23/24/31 1100 5.34
−6 33 25 L ACC 32 110 4.43
Speech (L IFGo) Y > M −3 12 52 L SMA 6/8 3498 5.35
−51 −16 −11 L STC 21/22 741 4.77
54 −28 3 R STC 21/22 630 4.52
Y > O −10 35 25 L ACC 8/9/32 3235 5.82
−5 29 52 L SFC 5.28
−4 −21 37 L PCC 24/31 218 4.29
Semantic (L TPole) Y > M −54 −15 −11 L STC 22 114 4.31
Y > O 10 −34 36 R PCC 23/31 978 5.33
−40 −3 10 L Insula 13 217 4.72
26 33 −21 R OFC 11 200 4.33
Executive (R DLPFC) Y > O −4 −22 43 L PCC 24/31 419 4.99

The regions listed showed significant between-group differences (P < 0.05, FWE corrected). x, y, z coordinates are reported in standard MNI space.

Abbreviations

DMN

default-mode network

ANG

angular gyrus

IFGo

inferior frontal gyrus, pars opercularis

TPole

temporal pole

DLPFC

dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

PFC

prefrontal cortex

PCC

posterior cingulate cortex

ACC

anterior cingulate cortex

SMA

supplementary motor area

STC

superior temporal cortex

SFC

superior frontal cortex

OFC

orbitofrontal cortex

R

right

L

left

Y

young group

M

middle-aged group

O

old group

BA

Brodmann area.