Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 21;13:92. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-92

Table 3.

Class size and characteristics, according to conditional probability of individuals in each response item (Stereotypes and Restrictions)

Stigma dimension
 
 
Profile 1
Profile 2
Profile 3
 
 
 
“no stigma”
“unobtrusive stigma”
“great stigma”
 
 
 
(n = 337)
(n = 471)
(n = 606)
  Item Responsea (%) (%) (%)
Negative stereotypes
Dangerous
More
12.8
8.5
35.9
Equally
69.0
80.2
54.1
Less
18.2
11.3
10.0
Unpredictable
More
47.5
38.7
84.8
Equally
38.5
56.0
8.6
Less
14.0
5.3
6.6
Strange
More
36.2
38.9
72.9
Equally
48.1
55.8
16.9
Less
15.7
5.3
10.2
Untrustworthy
More
6.5
2.2
29.2
Equally
78.9
92.3
57.0
Less
14.6
5.5
13.8
Positive Stereotypes
Healthy
Less
44.9
56.9
81.2
Equally
47.6
39.4
15.2
More
7.5
3.7
3.6
Controlled
Less
44.9
40.4
82.9
Equally
46.5
55.3
11.1
More
8.6
4.3
6.0
Talented
Less
8.0
7.0
24.8
Equally
82.2
88.1
64.2
More
9.8
4.9
11.0
Rational
Less
33.9
35.0
80.0
Equally
57.7
58.8
13.2
More
8.4
6.2
6.8
Restrictions
Involuntary admission
Agrees
94.5
99.4
97.5
Disagrees
5.5
0.6
2.5
Should not have a driver’s license
Agrees
2.7
0.9
12.4
Disagrees
97.3
99.1
87.6
Should not have the right to vote
Agrees
13.4
13.7
41.2
    Disagrees 86.6 86.3 58.8

Bold: highest percentage on the line.

aThe first response-item always corresponds to the most stigmatizing answer.

Note: between-group differences were statistical significant for all items (P < .001).