Table 2.
Comparison of RAP between Signals 1 and 2
|
PatID |
N (4-min RAP observations) |
RAP (average + std) |
Differences in RAP between Signals 1 and 2 (N, %) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Signal 1 | Signal 2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.6 | ||
|
Category A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
685 |
0.45±0.4 |
0.42±0.39 |
315 (46%) |
162 (24%) |
45 (7%) |
| 2 |
1,040 |
0.37±0.22 |
0.36±0.22 |
105 (10%) |
6 (1%) |
1 |
| 3 |
414 |
0.83±0.17 |
0.78±0.21 |
52 (13%) |
18 (4%) |
7 (2%) |
| 4 |
604 |
0.58±0.29 |
0.65±0.28 |
115 (19%) |
23 (4%) |
8 (1%) |
| 5 |
1,065 |
0.57±0.38 |
0.59±0.36 |
419 (39%) |
206 (19%) |
78 (7%) |
|
Category B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
211 |
0.55±0.39 |
−0.74±0.20 |
207 (98%) |
201 (95%) |
190 (90%) |
| 7 |
1,499 |
0.56±0.35 |
0.11±0.58 |
1,060 (71%) |
838 (56%) |
673 (45%) |
| 8 |
274 |
0.67±0.37 |
0.28±0.67 |
140 (51%) |
95 (35%) |
70 (26%) |
| 9 |
191 |
0.09±0.43 |
0.13±0.43 |
130 (68%) |
84 (44%) |
44 (23%) |
| 10 |
302 |
0.88±0.13 |
0.86±0.14 |
61 (20%) |
17 (6%) |
1 |
|
Category C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
1,834 |
0.62±0.27 |
0.80±0.17 |
844 (46%) |
347 (19%) |
129 (7%) |
| 12 |
4.777 |
0.15±0.29 |
0.16±0.28 |
2,661 (56%) |
1,135 (24%) |
427 (9%) |
| 13 |
1,861 |
0.33±0.35 |
0.35±0.32 |
922 (50%) |
345 (19%) |
103 (6%) |
| 14 |
2,361 |
0.34±0.31 |
0.30±0.35 |
1,259 (53%) |
573 (24%) |
234 (10%) |
| 15 |
2,022 |
0.50±2.9 |
0.38±0.32 |
923 (46%) |
500 (25%) |
318 (16%) |
| 16 |
15 |
0.31±0.34 |
0.45±0.40 |
4 (26.7%) |
3 (20%) |
2 (13%) |
| 17 |
764 |
0.71±0.27 |
0.69±0.34 |
197 (26%) |
99 (13%) |
62 (8%) |
|
Category D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
1,841 |
0.66±0.28 |
0.61±0.31 |
354 (19%) |
114 (6%) |
35 (2%) |
| 19 |
578 |
0.04±0.36 |
0.06±0.34 |
319 (55%) |
162 (28%) |
87 (15%) |
| 20 | 718 | 0.65±0.35 | 0.48±0.43 | 339 (47%) | 215 (30%) | 135 (19%) |
RAP: Relationship Amplitude – Pressure.