Table 5.
Predicted and calculated binding energy (kcal) for all compounds toward MMP-2.
| Compound | ΔG exp | ΔG calc (R-model) |
ΔG calc (S-model) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1a | −4.837 | −4.628 | −4.484 |
| 1b | −4.428 | −4.734 | −4.619 |
| 1c | —a | —a | —a |
| 1d R | −4.319 | −4.512 | |
| 1d S | −4.492 | ||
| 1e R | −4.565 | −4.395 | |
| 1e S | −4.614 | ||
| 1f | −4.333 | −4.538 | −4.592 |
| 1g R | −4.796 | −4.583 | |
| 1g S | −4.739 | ||
| 1h R | −4.497 | −4.421 | |
| 1h S | −4.303 | ||
| 1i R | −4.210 | −4.391 | |
| 1i S | −4.379 | ||
| 1j R | −4.469 | —a | —a |
| 1j S | −4.511 | ||
| 1k R | −4.469 | −4.237 | |
| 1k S | −4.513 | ||
| 1l R | −4.524 | −4.624 | |
| 1l S | −4.338 | ||
| 25a | −5.655 | −5.506 | −5.326 |
| 25d R | −5.396 | −5.349 | |
| 25d S | −5.279 | ||
| 25e R | −5.069 | 5.179 | |
| 25e S | −5.378 |
aNo suitable docking poses were found.