Table 4.
Study | Pts a | Tumor Levelsb | γGTc | Cntrld | Ratioe (T/C) | Clinical Response |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ovarian | ||||||
| ||||||
(Abou Ghalia, 2000) | 13 | 11.6 ± 2.4 mM/g-protein | Y | B | 2.1* | |
| ||||||
(Bailey 1998) | 8 | 225–325f ng/mg-tissue | Y | Levels ↓ with BSO | ||
| ||||||
(Britten, Green and Warenius 1992) | 16 | 1.9 ± 0.1 nmol/mg-protein | N | H | 0.35 | Levels ↑ with therapy |
1.11 ± 0.08 nmol/106 cells | 4.1 | |||||
| ||||||
(Cheng et al. 1997) | 20 | 0.2 – 52.8 μg/mg-protein | Y | Levels ↑ in non-responders after therapy | ||
| ||||||
(Djuric et al. 1990) | 37 | 379 ± 67 nmol/ml-cytosol | Y | P | 1.7 | Levels ↓ after therapy |
| ||||||
(Ghazal-Aswad et al. 1996) | 39 | 3758 – 8351 nmol/g-dry wt | Y | No correlation pretreatment levels and response | ||
| ||||||
(Hengstler et al. 2001) | 189 | Y | Some correlation pretreatment levels and response | |||
| ||||||
(Joncourt et al. 1998) | 39 | 16.8 Stage I–II nmol/mg-protein | Y | P | >1* | No correlation pretreatment levels and response |
35.3 Stage III | ||||||
49.2 Stage IV | ||||||
| ||||||
(Kigawa et al. 1998a) | 32 | 2.1 – 53.8 μg/mg-protein | Y | No correlation pretreatment levels and response | ||
| ||||||
(Kigawa et al. 1998b) | 26 | 0.1 – 52.8 μg/mg-protein | Y | Levels ↑in non-responders | ||
| ||||||
(O’Dwyer et al. 1996) | 4 | 64.0 ± 89.5f nmol/mg-protein | Y | Levels ↓ with BSO | ||
| ||||||
(Sprem et al. 2001) | 15 | 126.3 ± 12.8* nmol/mg-protein | N | H | 2.6* | |
| ||||||
(Tanner et al. 1997) | 139 | 4.4 Stage I–II μg/mg-protein 6.0 Stage III–IV* |
Y | ↑pretreatment levels correlate with ↓survival | ||
Cervical | ||||||
| ||||||
(Ahmed et al. 1999) | 27 | All 6.72 ± 2.68 μg/mg-protein | Y | H | 0.50* | |
Stage I 9.12 ± 2.1 | ||||||
Stage II 8.58 ± 2.27 | ||||||
Stage III 4.85 ± 1.12 | ||||||
Stage IV 4.1 ± 0.85 | ||||||
| ||||||
(Balasubramaniyan, Subramanian and Govindaswamy 1994) | 238 | 64.72 ± 9.71 Stg I μmol/mg-protein | Y | H | 1.0 | |
49.41 ± 11.40 Stage II | 0.77* | |||||
43.65 ± 10.14 Stage III | 0.69* | |||||
32.73 ± 7.26 Stage IV | 0.51* | |||||
| ||||||
(Chang, Chang and Hsueh 1993) | 2 | 38.1±10.1 nmol/mg-prot Case 1 | Y | P | 2.0* | |
39.0 ± 9.0 Case 2 | 1.0 | |||||
| ||||||
(Guichard et al. 1990) | 18 | 25.0 nmol/mg-protein | N | P | ~1 | |
| ||||||
(Hedley et al. 2005) | 58 | Y | No correlation pretreatment levels and response | |||
| ||||||
(Jadhav et al. 1998) | 45 | 1.6–5.9 μmol/mg-protein | Y | H | Responders show greater↓ than non-responders | |
| ||||||
(Osmak et al. 1997)g | 30 | 110.1 ± 46.4 nmol/mg-protein | N | P | 0.87 | |
| ||||||
(Vukovic, Nicklee and Hedley 2000) | 10 | 2.86 ± 0.15 mM | Y | P | ~2 |
Number of patients with cancer in the study
Concentration of glutathione or thiols in tissue. Numbers in italics indicates reports of non-protein sulfhydryls rather than glutathione.
Denotes whether degradation by γ-glutamyltranspeptidase was prevented (Y) or not (N) by sample processing methods.
Disease free tissue from healthy controls (H); peritumoral tissue (P) or benign lesion (B).
Ratio of tumor glutathione to control tissue levels. Gray shading indicates statistically significant T/C<1
Tumor levels from chemotherapy-resistant ovarian cancer patients.
Tumor and normal tissue from corpus uteri.
Asterisk indicates statistically significant differences in glutathione levels.