Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 26;8(3):e59832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059832

Table 1. Efficiency of the MIP.

BMIS BMIS AffectGrid AffectGrid
Positive Items Negative Items Valence Scale Arousal Scale
Pre-MIP Post-MIP Pre-MIP Post-MIP Pre-MIP Post-MIP Pre-MIP Post-MIP
Neutral MIP 24.719 22.625 23.609 23.563 1.127 .984 .476 .127
(.528) (.602) (.425) (.415) (.166) (.197) (.178) (.183)
Sad MIP 24.484 21.781 23.5 21.984 1.344 .141 .375 −.438
(.528) (.602) (.425) (.415) (.165) (.195) (.177) (.181)
Average 24.602 22.203 23.555 22.773 1.235 .562 .426 −.155
(.373) (.426) (.3) (.293) (.117) (.139) (.126) (.129)

Average raw scores obtained on the BMIS positive and negative items and on the Affect Grid valence and arousal scales (all participants, n = 128). Standard deviations are in parentheses.