Table 5.
Multiple regression analyzes for inhibitory control predicting internalization measures.
| BEHAVIOR REGULATION | CONCERN OCCASIONED BY OTHERS' TRANSGRESSIONS | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE B | β | B | SE B | β | |
| Age | 0.08 | 0.17 | 0.05 | −0.30 | 0.21 | −0.16 |
| Gendera | 0.30 | 0.17 | 0.18+ | 0.64 | 0.20 | 0.33** |
| Perceived SES | 0.24 | 0.12 | 0.21+ | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.10 |
| Inhibitory control | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.31** | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.18 |
| CONFESSION | REPARATION | |||||
| B | SE B | β | B | SE B | β | |
| Age | 0.04 | 0.21 | 0.02 | −0.11 | 0.18 | −0.07 |
| Gendera | −0.09 | 0.21 | −0.05 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.09 |
| Perceived SES | 0.04 | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.16 | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Inhibitory control | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.23+ | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.22+ |
Note. R2 of the full model was 0.19 (p < 0.01) for Behavior regulation, 0.16 (p < 0.01) for Concern occasioned by others' transgressions, 0.07 (p = 0.27) for Confession, and 0.08 (p = 0.16) for Reparation. Change in R2(Δ R2) when including the variable Inhibitory control in the model was 0.08 (p < 0.01) for Behavior regulation, 0.03 (p = 0.10) for Concern occasioned by others' transgressions, 0.05 (p = 0.05) for Confession, and 0.04 (p = 0.06) for Reparation.
a
Dummy coded: 0 = boys, 1 = girls.
+
p < 0.10.
**
p < 0.01.