Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 28;15(4):245–251. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00572.x

Table 4.

Postoperative outcome after implementation of a clinical pathway

Study Type of surgery Hospital LoS, days, study group versus control group Morbidity, %, study group versus control group Mortality, %, study group versus control group Readmissions, %, study group versus control group
van Dam et al. 200816 HE, EHE, ME, SE, CR, RHE 6 versus 8 (P < 0.001) 41 versus 31 (NS) 0 versus 2 (NS) 13 versus 10 (NS)

Lin et al. 201122 SE, HE, EHE, CR 7 versus 11 (P < 0.001) 46.4 versus 43.3 (NS) 1.8 versus 1.6 (NS) 7.1 versus 3.3 (NS)

Stoot et al. 200923 Laparoscopic: ME, SE, LLS 5 versus 7 (NS) 15.3 versus 15.3 (NS) 0 versus 0 (NS) 0 versus 0 (NS)

Functional recovery: 3 versus 5 (P < 0.04)

Hendry et al. 201020 HE, ME, SE, CR 6 17 2 5

Functional recovery: 4

Koea et al. 200921 HE, EHE, ME, SE 4.7 ± 0.9 (intrathecal morphine) 6.8 ± 1.2 (epidural) 19 0 4

MacKay & O'Dwyer 200824 HE, SE 4 (2–7) 16.6 0 0

LoS, length of stay; HE, hemi-hepatectomy; EHE; extended hemi-hepatectomy; ME, metastasectomy; SE, segmentectomy; CR, central resection; RHE; repeat hemi-hepatectomy; LLS, left lateral sectionectomy; NS, not significant.