Table 4.
Reliability for more bacterial taxa in the three-modality latent variable SEM measurement model (Sanger, 454_V1V3 and 454_V3V5), and its correlation to the latent variable
|
Three-measurement modality model |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sanger | 454_V1V3 | 454_V3V5 | |
| (A) Proteobacteria |
|
|
|
| Reliability |
0.657 |
0.641 |
0.974 |
| (95% CI) |
(0.524, 0.793) |
(0.529, 0.724) |
(0.878, 1.000) |
| Correlation to the latent variable |
0.811 |
0.801 |
0.987 |
| (95% CI) |
(0.724, 0.891) |
(0.727, 0.851) |
(0.937, 1.000) |
| (B) Firmicutes/Clostridia/Clostridiales/LachnoIV |
|
|
|
| Reliability |
0.685 |
0.923 |
0.793 |
| (95% CI) |
(0.582, 0.804) |
(0.837, 1.000) |
(0.688, 0.903) |
| Correlation to the latent variable |
0.827 |
0.961 |
0.890 |
| (95% CI) |
(0.763, 0.897) |
(0.915, 1.000) |
(0.829, 0.950) |
| (C) Actinobacteria |
|
|
|
| Reliability |
0.582 |
0.854 |
0.882 |
| (95% CI) |
(0.424, 0.700) |
(0.743, 0.942) |
(0.765, 0.976) |
| Correlation to the latent variable |
0.763 |
0.924 |
0.939 |
| (95% CI) |
(0.652, 0.837) |
(0.862, 0.970) |
(0.875, 0.988) |
| (D) Bacteroidetes |
|
|
|
| Reliability |
0.684 |
0.828 |
0.980 |
| (95% CI) |
(0.323, 0.922) |
(0.652, 1.000) |
(0.941, 1.000) |
| Correlation to the latent variable |
0.827 |
0.910 |
0.990 |
| (95% CI) |
(0.569, 0.960) |
(0.808, 1.000) |
(0.970, 1.000) |
| (E) Firmicutes/Bacilli |
|
|
|
| Reliability |
0.698 |
0.953 |
0.959 |
| (95% CI) |
(0.553, 0.797) |
(0.888, 1.000) |
(0.913, 0.995) |
| Correlation to the latent variable |
0.835 |
0.976 |
0.979 |
| (95% CI) | (0.744, 0.893) | (0.942, 1.000) | (0.956, 0.998) |
The 95% confidence intervals are obtained using bootstrap resampling with 100 replications.