Table 2. Symptomatic patients treated either nonoperatively or operatively for os odontoideum and their results.
Author | N | Mean age (range) in years | % male | Preexisting diagnosis | Symptoms | Instability | Operative treatment | Mean follow-up (range) in years | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dai | 39 | 25(7–56) | 75%* | n = 18
|
Local symptoms:
|
95% | yes | 6.5 (1–16) | Fusion: 100% All symptoms
|
Fielding | 35 | 19 (3–65) | 60% |
|
|
100% | yes | 3.4 (1–10) | All symptoms
|
Gluf | 22 | 10(4–16) | 66%† | ns | Not described | 100% | yes | 2.8 (0.25–8.9) | Fusion: 100% |
Klimo | 78 | 21 (1.5–73) | 62% | n = 5
|
|
77% ant: 70% post: 10% A-P: 13% | yes | 1.2 (0.1–9.6) | Fusion: 100% Pain
|
Menezes | 134 | 4–58 | 55% |
|
|
yes | yes | ns | Fusion: 98.5%
|
Spierings | 36 | 38 (6–62) | 78% |
|
Group A: no cord symptoms (n = 15) Group B: no cord symptoms (n = 9) Group C: cord symptoms (n = 4) Group D: cord symptoms (n = 8) |
nr nr nr nr |
no yes no yes |
8 (0.5–18) | All symptoms resolved:
|
nr = not reported.
Dai: % male includes asymptomatic and symptomatic patients.
Gluf reports % male for a study population of 45 patients with other diagnoses and 22 os odontoideum patients.
Menezes: possibly other patients have preexisting diagnoses; these 12 patients are specifically listed as among those with reducible lesions but worsening extension.