Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 27;8(3):e59415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059415

Table 1. Thermodynamics of binding of cJun analogues to cFos. Columns (from left to right) show i) Tm values from thermal denaturation analysis ii) calculated % helicity for each respective pair calculated from circular dichroism spectra and iii) KD values calculated from thermal denaturation data.

Peptide complex Tm °C % Helical KD(20) (Thermal) µM *KD(20) M−1 (ITC) µM N ΔG(20) kcal/mol (ITC) ΔH kcal/mol #TΔS kcal/mol [ΔH – ΔG]
cFos-cFos −1 20% 325 N/D N/D N/D N/D N/D
cFos-JunWCANDI 44 42% 0.45 1.2±0.05 0.8±0.01 −7.9±0.03 −14.8±0.3 −6.9±0.3
cFos-1 55 65% 0.50 0.39±0.03 0.8±0.01 −8.6±0.04 −11.6±0.1 −3.0±0.1
cFos-2 53 39% 0.19 1.44±0.09 1.2±0.01 −7.8±0.04 −7.1±0.1 +0.7±0.1
cFos-8 32 38% 21.5 55±12.45 1.0±0.35 −5.7±0.13 −9.5±0.4 −3.8±0.4
cFos-9 38 47% 9.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
cFos-10 49 52% 1.7 5.8±0.78 0.8±0.01 −7.0±0.08 −8.4±0.9 −1.4±0.9
cFos-11 47 55% 5.8 5.4±0.28 0.7±0.01 −7.0±0.03 −7.7±0.2 −0.7±0.2
cFos-12 52 40% 1.2 7.6±0.51 1.0±0.02 −6.8±0.04 −6.1±0.2 0.7±0.2
cFos-17 44 40% 7.8 11.4±0.88 1.0±0.03 −6.6±.0.05 −5.4±0.3 1.2±0.3
cFos-20 48 49% 3.8 11.2±0.82 1.1±0.03 −6.6±0.04 −7.5±0.3 −0.9±0.3
cFos-22 51 40% 1.4 11.9±1.16 1.4±0.04 −6.6±0.06 −5.0±0.2 1.6±0.2
cFos-24 58 52% 7.2 7.25±0.64 1.1±0.03 −6.9±0.05 −8.8±0.4 −1.9±0.4

The remaining three columns give stoichiometry of binding and thermodynamic data calculated from ITC, with TΔS calculated according to the Gibbs Helmholtz equation.

*

data calculated using the midpoint of the transition from thermal denaturation profiles (and fit as temperature as a function of lnKD, with the fit lnKD = aT+C where a is the gradient, T is the temperature in Celsius and C is the intercept) and calculated at 20°C.

#

Calculated according to TΔS = ΔH−ΔG.