Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Haematol. 2012 Dec 17;160(4):547–554. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12167

Table I.

Population characteristics

Patients Relatives
Diagnosis DBA FA DC SDS Other* Non-DBA DBA Non-DBA P1 P2 P3
 No. of patients 37 20 21 10 13 64 73 13
 Male: Female 19:18 5:15§ 17:4^§ 5:5 6:7 33:31 32:41 2:11§ 1 0.6 0.05
Age (years)
 median (range) 13 (2–58) 23.5 (4–56) 19 (3–46) 11.5 (5–42) 15 (3–37) 16 (3–56) 31 (1–62) 30 (3–64) 0.4 0.1 0.03
eADA level (iu/g of Hb)
 mean ± SD 1.58 ± 0.81 0.57 ± 0.27 0.56 ± 0.18 0.65 ± 0.25 0.59 ± 0.14 0.58 ± 0.21 0.61 ± 0.2 0.57 ± 0.15 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 median (range) 1.33 (0.65–4.62) 0.53 (0.17–1.41) 0.52 (0.36–1.07) 0.64 (0.37–1.23) 0.63 (0.38–0.85) 0.54 (0.17–1.41) 0.58 (0.26–1.49) 0.55 (0.37–0.93)
 No. of patients with eADA ≥ 1 iu/g of Hb (%) 31 (84) 1 (5) 1 (5) 1 (10) 0 (0) 3 (5) 5 (7) 0 (0) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

DBA, Diamond-Blackfan anaemia; FA, Fanconi anaemia; DC, dyskeratosis congenita; SDS, Shwachman-Diamond syndrome; eADA, erythrocyte adenosine deaminase; Hb, haemoglobin.

*

Includes: FA-like, DC-like, SDS-like, thrombocytopenia absent radii, and severe congenital neutropenia.

P1: DBA vs. Non-DBA patients. P2: DBA vs. DBA relatives, P3: DBA vs. Non-DBA relatives.

^

When analysed on individual basis this is statistically different from DBA patients.

§

There is a statistically significant difference between number of males and females in this population