Table 1.
Alterations in miR expression as a function of EWS/Fli1 or/and presumed cell of origin in Ewing sarcoma.
Ban et al. (2011) | McKinsey et al. (2011) | Franzetti et al. (2012) | De Vito et al. (2011a) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
miRs up in EwS | 500 | 17/20a/106a/93 | 34c | 19a/19b |
126* | 484 | 573 | 17/20a/106a/106b/93 | |
93* | 92a/92b/25 | 150 | 103/107 | |
505 | 15b | 486 | 15b | |
128 | 103/107 | 363 | 18a | |
126 | 324-5p | 556 | ||
9 | 423-3p | 9* | ||
101 | 320 | 632 | ||
425* | let-7d | 675 | ||
592 | 106b* | 520a* | ||
340* | 130b | 106a | ||
505* | 760 | 302b* | ||
652 | 378 | 9 | ||
150 | 532-3p | 346 | ||
20a* | 665 | 1229 | ||
886-5p | 504 | |||
574-5p | 663 | |||
940 | 1270 | |||
296-3p | 204 | |||
186 | 490 | |||
181d | 20b | |||
622 | ||||
105 | ||||
miRs down in EwS | 145 | 146a/146b-5p | 452 | let-7 Family |
424 | 21 | 145 | 199a-5p/199a-3p | |
21 | 22 | 144 | 27a/27b | |
214* | 100/99a/99b | 143 | 24 | |
214 | 125b | 205 | 193a | |
28-5p | 221/222 | 509 | 886-3p | |
424* | 584 | 190 | 145 | |
27a* | 199a-5p/199a-3p | 223 | 23a/23b | |
22* | 29a | 31 | 22 | |
409-3p | 27a/27b | 767-3p | 143 | |
21* | 193b | 30a-3p | 100 | |
125b | 549 | 511 | 221/222 | |
708 | 95 | 365 | 31 | |
135b | 127-3p | 517c | 125b | |
941 | 224 | 21 | ||
203 | 450 | |||
574-3p | 574 | |||
186* | 668 | |||
493 | 222 | |||
922 | 34a | |||
30a | 199b | |||
603 | 542-3p | |||
137 | ||||
30a-5p | ||||
146a | ||||
328 |
Data from expression profiling studies using EWS/Fli1 depletion (McKinsey et al., 2011; Franzetti et al., 2012), Ewing Sarcoma versus mesenchymal stem cell comparison (De Vito et al., 2011a), or both (Ban et al., 2011). MiRs with shared seed sequence are grouped. MiRs in bold were detected as differentially expressed in at least two of the studies. MiRs in italics were shown to affect cancer phenotype(s) in Ewing Sarcoma. “*” Denotes the generally less abundantly expressed miR strand. See text and references for further details.