Table 2.
Cross tabulations of predictive indicators and the outcome “Maintenance Care (MC) recommendation”
| Predictors | MC –yes (N) | Total % (N) | Number of predictors | MC-yes (N) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Long duration + |
|
|
|
|
|
Many episodes + |
93.4% (57) |
24 (61) |
3 |
93.4% (57) |
|
Definitely better |
|
|
|
|
|
Long duration + |
|
|
|
|
|
Many episodes + |
86.8% (33) |
15 (38) |
2 |
83.3% (70) |
| NOT better |
|
|
||
| SHORT duration + |
|
|
||
|
Many episodes + |
84.6% (11) |
5 (13) |
||
|
Definitely better |
|
|
||
|
Long duration + |
|
|
||
| FEW episodes + |
78.8% (26) |
13 (33) |
||
|
Definitely better |
|
|
||
| SHORT duration + |
|
|
1 |
68.8% (64) |
|
Many episodes + |
87.5% (7) |
3 (8 ) |
||
| NOT better |
|
|
||
|
Long duration + |
|
|
||
| FEW episodes + |
61.5% (8) |
5 (13) |
||
| NOT better |
|
|
||
| SHORT duration + |
|
|
||
| FEW episodes + |
68.1% (49) |
28 (72) |
||
|
Definitely better |
|
|
||
| SHORT duration + |
|
|
|
|
| FEW episodes + |
73.3% (11) |
6 (15) |
0 |
73.3% (11) |
| NOT better |
Outcome of the predictors in bold are à priori expected to be associated with recommendations for MC.