Table 1.
Family No. | Nucleotide change1 | Amino acid change | Mutation type | Exon | Allele frequency in 1846 controls | dbSNP | EVS | PhyloP2 [-14,1;6,4] | Grantham distance3 [0–215] | In-silico predictions4 | Novel variant | Pathogenicity class5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patients with 2 pathogenic or likely pathogenic SACS variants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1 index |
c.9305_9306insT |
p.Leu3102Phefs*8 |
frame shift |
10 |
0 |
- |
- |
NA |
NA |
NA |
yes |
Pathogenic (class 5) |
|
c.9305_9306insT |
p.Leu3102Phefs*8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1 sister |
see above |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
c.2182C>T |
p.Arg728* |
nonsense |
9 |
0 |
- |
- |
ND |
NA |
NA |
no6 |
Pathogenic (class 5) |
|
c.13056delT |
p.Phe4352Leufs*11 |
frame shift |
10 |
0 |
- |
- |
NA |
NA |
NA |
yes |
Pathogenic (class 5) |
#3 index |
c.3769G>T |
p.Gly1257* |
nonsense |
10 |
0 |
- |
- |
ND |
NA |
NA |
yes |
Pathogenic (class 5) |
|
c. 8584A>T |
p.Lys2862* |
nonsense |
10 |
0 |
- |
- |
ND |
NA |
NA |
yes |
Pathogenic (class 5) |
#3 sister |
see above |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 index |
c.11542_11544del |
p.Ile3848del |
in-frame deletion |
10 |
0 |
- |
- |
NA |
NA |
NA |
yes |
Likely pathogenic (VUS class 4) |
|
c.11542_11544del |
p.Ile3848del |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 brother |
see above |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 index |
c.2387delT |
p.Leu796Tyrfs*13 |
frame shift |
10 |
0 |
- |
- |
NA |
NA |
NA |
yes |
Pathogenic (class 5) |
|
c.11984_11986 dupTGT |
p.L3995dup |
in-frame duplication |
10 |
0 |
- |
- |
NA |
NA |
NA |
yes |
Likely pathogenic (VUS class 4) |
#5 sister |
see above |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
c.11624 G>A |
p.Arg3875His |
missense |
10 |
0 |
- |
- |
6.34 |
29 |
Deleterious |
yes |
Likely pathogenic (VUS class 4) |
|
c.1647_1658del |
p.Leu549_Leu552del |
In-frame deletion |
8 |
0 |
- |
- |
NA |
NA |
NA |
yes |
Likely pathogenic (VUS class 4) |
|
c.13538 G>A |
p.Ser4513Asn |
missense |
10 |
0 |
rs138328181 (0% ESP Cohort pop) |
0.02% (EA), 0% (AA) |
3.43 |
46 |
Contradictory |
yes |
Uncertain (VUS class 3) |
#7 |
c.5544dupA |
p.Val1849Serfs*48 |
frame shift |
10 |
0 |
- |
- |
NA |
NA |
NA |
yes |
Pathogenic (class 5) |
|
c.12603C>A |
p.Tyr4201* |
nonsense |
10 |
0 |
- |
- |
ND |
NA |
NA |
yes |
Pathogenic (class 5) |
#8 |
c.7277 G>C |
p.Arg2426Pro |
missense |
10 |
0 |
- |
- |
5.69 |
103 |
Deleterious |
yes |
Likely pathogenic (VUS class 4) |
|
c.8920_8923dup |
p.Tyr2975Phefs*29 |
frame shift |
10 |
0 |
- |
- |
NA |
NA |
NA |
yes |
Pathogenic (class 5) |
#9 |
c.4954C>T |
p.Gln1652* |
nonsense |
10 |
0 |
- |
- |
ND |
NA |
NA |
yes |
Pathogenic (class 5) |
|
c.5125C>T |
p.Gln1709* |
nonsense |
10 |
0 |
- |
- |
ND |
NA |
NA |
no6 |
Pathogenic (class 5) |
Patients with 2 SACS variants of uncertain clinical significance class 3 (VUS3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
c.1373C>T |
p.Thr458Ile |
missense |
8 |
14/3500 |
rs61729954 (0.3% ESP Cohort pop; 3.1% AGI ASP pop) |
0.33% (EA); 0.05% (AA) |
6.26 |
89 |
Deleterious |
yes |
Uncertain (VUS class 3) |
|
c.1373C>T |
p.Thr458Ile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
c.1373C>T (see patient #10) |
p.Thr458Ile |
missense |
8 |
14/3500 |
rs61729954 (0.3% ESP Cohort pop; 3.1% AGI ASP pop) |
0.33% (EA); 0.05% (AA) |
6.26 |
89 |
Deleterious |
yes |
Uncertain (VUS class 3) |
c.2983 G>T | p.Val995Phe | missense | 10 | 11/3500 | rs142967124 (0.1% ESP Cohort pop) | 0.24% (EA); 0.02% (AA) | -0.2 | 50 | Contradictory | yes | Uncertain (VUS class 3) |
EA= European alleles; AA= African American alleles; NA = not applicable; ND = not determined; rs = reference single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) identifier; VUS = variant of uncertain clinical significance. 1 Nomenclature of sequence variants follows the recommendations by the Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS, http://www.hgvs.org/mutnomen/) and refers to the cDNA sequence NM_014363.4. 2 PhyloP was used as a conservation score as originally implemented by Pollard and colleagues. It allows the rating of nucleotides from “not conserved” (-14.1) to “highly conserved” (6.4) [13]. 3 The Grantham distance was used to evaluate physico-chemical differences of amino acids (0 = no physico-chemical differences; 215 = large differences) [14]. 4 In-silico predictions were performed using PolyPhen-2 [9], SIFT [10] and MutationTaster [11]5 Classification of novel sequence variants is according to [7]. 6 Reported in [6].