Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 15;8:41. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-8-41

Table 1.

SACS mutations

Family No. Nucleotide change1 Amino acid change Mutation type Exon Allele frequency in 1846 controls dbSNP EVS PhyloP2 [-14,1;6,4] Grantham distance3 [0–215] In-silico predictions4 Novel variant Pathogenicity class5
Patients with 2 pathogenic or likely pathogenic SACS variants
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
#1 index
c.9305_9306insT
p.Leu3102Phefs*8
frame shift
10
0
-
-
NA
NA
NA
yes
Pathogenic (class 5)
 
c.9305_9306insT
p.Leu3102Phefs*8
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
#1 sister
see above
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
#2
c.2182C>T
p.Arg728*
nonsense
9
0
-
-
ND
NA
NA
no6
Pathogenic (class 5)
 
c.13056delT
p.Phe4352Leufs*11
frame shift
10
0
-
-
NA
NA
NA
yes
Pathogenic (class 5)
#3 index
c.3769G>T
p.Gly1257*
nonsense
10
0
-
-
ND
NA
NA
yes
Pathogenic (class 5)
 
c. 8584A>T
p.Lys2862*
nonsense
10
0
-
-
ND
NA
NA
yes
Pathogenic (class 5)
#3 sister
see above
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
#4 index
c.11542_11544del
p.Ile3848del
in-frame deletion
10
0
-
-
NA
NA
NA
yes
Likely pathogenic (VUS class 4)
 
c.11542_11544del
p.Ile3848del
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
#4 brother
see above
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
#5 index
c.2387delT
p.Leu796Tyrfs*13
frame shift
10
0
-
-
NA
NA
NA
yes
Pathogenic (class 5)
 
c.11984_11986 dupTGT
p.L3995dup
in-frame duplication
10
0
-
-
NA
NA
NA
yes
Likely pathogenic (VUS class 4)
#5 sister
see above
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
#6
c.11624 G>A
p.Arg3875His
missense
10
0
-
-
6.34
29
Deleterious
yes
Likely pathogenic (VUS class 4)
 
c.1647_1658del
p.Leu549_Leu552del
In-frame deletion
8
0
-
-
NA
NA
NA
yes
Likely pathogenic (VUS class 4)
 
c.13538 G>A
p.Ser4513Asn
missense
10
0
rs138328181 (0% ESP Cohort pop)
0.02% (EA), 0% (AA)
3.43
46
Contradictory
yes
Uncertain (VUS class 3)
#7
c.5544dupA
p.Val1849Serfs*48
frame shift
10
0
-
-
NA
NA
NA
yes
Pathogenic (class 5)
 
c.12603C>A
p.Tyr4201*
nonsense
10
0
-
-
ND
NA
NA
yes
Pathogenic (class 5)
#8
c.7277 G>C
p.Arg2426Pro
missense
10
0
-
-
5.69
103
Deleterious
yes
Likely pathogenic (VUS class 4)
 
c.8920_8923dup
p.Tyr2975Phefs*29
frame shift
10
0
-
-
NA
NA
NA
yes
Pathogenic (class 5)
#9
c.4954C>T
p.Gln1652*
nonsense
10
0
-
-
ND
NA
NA
yes
Pathogenic (class 5)
 
c.5125C>T
p.Gln1709*
nonsense
10
0
-
-
ND
NA
NA
no6
Pathogenic (class 5)
Patients with 2 SACS variants of uncertain clinical significance class 3 (VUS3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
#10
c.1373C>T
p.Thr458Ile
missense
8
14/3500
rs61729954 (0.3% ESP Cohort pop; 3.1% AGI ASP pop)
0.33% (EA); 0.05% (AA)
6.26
89
Deleterious
yes
Uncertain (VUS class 3)
 
c.1373C>T
p.Thr458Ile
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
#11
c.1373C>T (see patient #10)
p.Thr458Ile
missense
8
14/3500
rs61729954 (0.3% ESP Cohort pop; 3.1% AGI ASP pop)
0.33% (EA); 0.05% (AA)
6.26
89
Deleterious
yes
Uncertain (VUS class 3)
  c.2983 G>T p.Val995Phe missense 10 11/3500 rs142967124 (0.1% ESP Cohort pop) 0.24% (EA); 0.02% (AA) -0.2 50 Contradictory yes Uncertain (VUS class 3)

EA= European alleles; AA= African American alleles; NA = not applicable; ND = not determined; rs = reference single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) identifier; VUS = variant of uncertain clinical significance. 1 Nomenclature of sequence variants follows the recommendations by the Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS, http://www.hgvs.org/mutnomen/) and refers to the cDNA sequence NM_014363.4. 2 PhyloP was used as a conservation score as originally implemented by Pollard and colleagues. It allows the rating of nucleotides from “not conserved” (-14.1) to “highly conserved” (6.4) [13]. 3 The Grantham distance was used to evaluate physico-chemical differences of amino acids (0 = no physico-chemical differences; 215 = large differences) [14]. 4 In-silico predictions were performed using PolyPhen-2 [9], SIFT [10] and MutationTaster [11]5 Classification of novel sequence variants is according to [7]. 6 Reported in [6].