Table 2.
Results of confirmatory factor analysis
| Models tested | Y-B χ2 | df | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | SRMR | BIC | ΔBIC | (df) Y-B Δχ2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Establishing best fitting models | |||||||||
| Emotional numbing (male) | 225.92 | 113 | .97 | .96 | .04 | .04 | 27062.18 | -- | |
| Dysphoria (male) | 248.907 | 113 | .96 | .96 | .04 | .04 | 27107.70 | 45.52 (D>EN)** | |
| Emotional Numbing (female) | 234.87 | 113 | .90 | .88 | .08 | .06 | 9036.25 | -- | |
| Dysphoria (female) | 232.44 | 113 | .90 | .89 | .08 | .06 | 9032.07 | 4.18 (D<EN) | |
| Invariance testing | |||||||||
| Model 1 (configural) | 861.12 | 486 | .95 | .94 | .04 | .03 | 48653.95 | -- | |
| Model 2 (metric) | 865.56 | 499 | .95 | .94 | .04 | .04 | 48576.27 | (13) 4.45 | |
| Model 3 (intercept) | 898.69 | 512 | .95 | .94 | .04 | .04 | 48526.21 | (13) 33.13** | |
| Model 4 (residual) | 1065.69 | 529 | .93 | .92 | .05 | .04 | 48684.85 | (17) 166.10** | |
| Model 5 (variance and covariance) | 939.59 | 522 | .94 | .93 | .04 | .04 | 48507.50 | (10) 40.90** | |
| Model 6 (factor mean) | 943.29 | 526 | .94 | .93 | .04 | .04 | 48484.21 | (4) 3.71 |
Note. Y-B = Yuen-Bentler. CFI = comparative fit index. TLI = Tucker Lewis Index. RMSEA = root mean square of approximation. SRMR = standardized root mean square residual. BIC = Bayesian information criterion. Y-B Δχ2 = Yuen-Bentler χ2 difference test. Model 5 is compared to model 3. D = Dysphoria. EN = Emotional numbing.
**
p < .001.