Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 28;9(3):e1002965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002965

Figure 3. As the protein lifetime decreases, a trade-off between dynamical and mechanistic error determines fidelity.

Figure 3

We consider a 2-stage model of gene expression with the input, Inline graphic, equal to the current rate of transcription, and the signal of interest Inline graphic. (A) The magnitude of the relative fidelity errors as a function of the protein degradation rate, Inline graphic (from Eqs. 11, 12 and 13), using a logarithmic axis. (B–D) Simulated data with Inline graphic as in Fig. 1A. The units for Inline graphic are chosen so that its variance equals one in each case (hence Inline graphic and Inline graphic). Pie charts show the fractions of the protein variance due to the mechanistic (m) and dynamical (d) errors and to the transformed signal. The latter equals Inline graphic. In B, the relative protein lifetime, Inline graphic, is higher than optimal (Inline graphic) and fidelity is 2.2; in C, Inline graphic is optimal (Inline graphic) and fidelity is 10.1; and in D, Inline graphic is lower than optimal (Inline graphic) and fidelity is 5.3. Dynamical error, Inline graphic, is the difference between Inline graphic (black) and the faithfully transformed signal Inline graphic (red), and decreases from B to D, while mechanistic error increases. The lower row shows the magnitudes of the relative dynamical error (black) and relative mechanistic error (orange). All rate parameters are as in Fig. 1 A&C with Inline graphic, unless otherwise stated.