Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan 10;208(4):308.e1–308.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.01.013

Table 3.

Effects of Pioglitazone (change from baseline) on outcome measures for males in non-treated and Pioglitazone-treated groups after prenatal and early postnatal exposure to maternal high fat diet

Non-treated Pioglitazone treated P value
Body weight (gm) 4.2 ± 1.0 0.3 ± 2.0 0.3
VAT as determined by CT (% from total area) 10.5 ± 5.0 6.2 ± 3.1 0.4
SAT as determined by CT % from total area) 1.2 ± 1.4 5.2± 1.8 0.2
Liver/spleen radiodensity (HU) 0.01 ± 0.04 0.08 ± 0.04 0.2
Triglyceride (mmol/L) 0.8 ± 0.2 −0.9 ± 0.04* 0.02
Fasting glucose (mg/dL) −32.4 ± 11.9 −55.8 ± 7.6 0.1
Fasting insulin(ng/mL) 0.58 ± 0.2 −0.6 ± 0.3* 0.03
HOMA-IR 3.7 ± 1.8 −7.3 ± 2.6* 0.03

Data are means ± SEM. VAT – visceral adipose tissue, SAT – subcutaneous adipose tissue, HOMA-IR – homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance.

*

indicate statistically significant difference between the groups (P<0.05.)