Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Dec 7;38(1):36–45. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23961

Table 2.

Clusters showing positive correlations between ApEn and MMSE, and negative correlations between ApEn and CDR

Brain Region Cluster Centraid
(x, y, z)
Cluster Size
(kc)
Peak T Peak
SVC p
MMSE Positive Correlation
Left Postcentral Gyrus −24,−32, 68 49 6.52 0.001
Right Precuneus 8, −70, 56 103 6.22 0.002
Right Supramarginal Gyrus 56,−42,30 52 5.85 0.002
Right Paracentral Lobule 8, −38, 72 38 5.50 0.002
Right Angular Gyrus 44, −62, 40 19 4.85 0.009
Right Mid Temporal Gyrus 46, 0, −20 27 4.44 0.044
Right Putamen 30, 6, 2 12 4.41 0.013
Left Lingual Gyrus −14, −68, −12 19 4.36 0.027
Left Precuneus −14, −64, 60 10 3.92 0.084
CDR-SOB Negative Correlation
Right Supramarginal Gyrus 56, −44, 28 57 6.61 0.001
Right Precuneus 6, −72, 54 164 6.08 0.002
Right Paracentral Lobule 8, −38, 74 28 5.27 0.002
Left Postcentral Gyrus −22, −32, 70 33 5.11 0.008
Right Angular Gyrus 44, −64, 38 11 4.20 0.029

Age and mutation status are included in the regression analyses. Level of significance is set at uncorrected p=0.001 (T=3.9), with kc ≥ 10. Peak p values after small volume correction using AAL ROIs are shown. All except the left precuneus cluster () have peak SVC p<0.05