Table 4. Effect sizes for all studies.
Acc - Con | Dec - Acc | Dec - Con | ||||
Expt 1a | Retrospective | 0.011 | 0.000 | −0.138 | 0.250 | 0.111 |
Expt 1b | Prospective | 0.016 | 0.001 | −0.290 | 0.227 | −0.084 |
Expt 1c | Retrospective | 0.004 | 0.000 | n/a | −0.129 | n/a |
Expt 1c | Prospective | 0.002 | 0.000 | n/a | 0.081 | n/a |
Expt 2 | Retrospective | 0.010 | 0.000 | 0.148 | 0.209 | 0.398 |
Expt 2 | Prospective | 0.027 | 0.002 | −0.227 | 0.178 | −0.052 |
Expt 3 | Retrospective | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.049 | −0.071 | −0.024 |
The and columns show the effect sizes for the effect of temporal structure on duration estimate in each experiment/condition. The effects for the prospective and retrospective judgment data from Experiments 1c and 2 have been analyzed separately, so each analysis is based on a one-way design and the partial eta-squared values shown here are identical to eta-squared. Note also that the calculation of omega-squared assumes a balanced design, but there were slightly unequal cell-sizes in Experiment 3. The last 3 columns show the standardized differences between means g* [64] calculated using the metafor package for R [46]. Acc = accelerating, Dec = Decelerating; Con = Constant-rate.