Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 28;8(3):e59847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059847

Table 4. Effect sizes for all studies.

Inline graphic Inline graphic Acc - Con Dec - Acc Dec - Con
Expt 1a Retrospective 0.011 0.000 −0.138 0.250 0.111
Expt 1b Prospective 0.016 0.001 −0.290 0.227 −0.084
Expt 1c Retrospective 0.004 0.000 n/a −0.129 n/a
Expt 1c Prospective 0.002 0.000 n/a 0.081 n/a
Expt 2 Retrospective 0.010 0.000 0.148 0.209 0.398
Expt 2 Prospective 0.027 0.002 −0.227 0.178 −0.052
Expt 3 Retrospective 0.001 0.000 0.049 −0.071 −0.024

The Inline graphic and Inline graphiccolumns show the effect sizes for the effect of temporal structure on duration estimate in each experiment/condition. The effects for the prospective and retrospective judgment data from Experiments 1c and 2 have been analyzed separately, so each analysis is based on a one-way design and the partial eta-squared values shown here are identical to eta-squared. Note also that the calculation of omega-squared assumes a balanced design, but there were slightly unequal cell-sizes in Experiment 3. The last 3 columns show the standardized differences between means g* [64] calculated using the metafor package for R [46]. Acc = accelerating, Dec = Decelerating; Con = Constant-rate.