Table 1. Comparison of microtubule dynamic instability measured by EGFP-tubulin or 2G4-GFP expression in LLCPK cells.
Dynamic Instability Parameters | 2G4-GFP | EGFP-Tub | EGFP-Tub [20] | EGFP-Tub [18] |
Growth Rate (µm/min) | 8.5±4.8 | 10.0±5.0 | 11.5±7.4 | 8.5±5.8 |
Shortening Rate (µm/min) | 12.0±9.4 | 16.9±9.9 | 13.1±8.4 | 11.3±7.9 |
Catastrophe Frequency (s−1) | .027±.004 | .05±.01 | .026±.024 | .053±.003 |
Rescue Frequency (s−1) | .086±0.13 | .106±.024 | .175±.104 | .086±.005 |
Percent Time in growth, shorteningand pause | 63.7, 19.3, 27 | 54.2, 26.6, 19.2 | 15, 11.5, 73.5 | 40.4, 26, 36.5 |
Dynamicity (µm/min) | 8.2±5.6 | 9.34±5.5 | 4±3.5 | 5.3±2.7 |
Parameters of dynamic instability measured using EGFP-α-tubulin (EGFP-Tub) as a tracer, expressed at about 10% of total a-tubulin levels, compared to that measured using 2G4-GFP bound to the external surface of microtubules. Published data sets derived from LLCPK cells expressing EGFP-α-tubulin are also included for comparison. Cells measured in reference [18] also expressed CFP.