Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Hematol. 2012 Aug 10;40(12):974–982.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2012.08.002

Table 2.

Logistic regression models for development of any stage skin or gut aGVHD

Target organ Factor aGVHD/patients
at risk
Odds ratio (95% CI) p Value
Skin aGVHD
Low CLA+ Tregs 27/49 1 0.020
High CLA+ Tregs* 6/25 0.27 (0.09–0.81)
Myeloablative 20/45 1 0.430
Reduced intensity 13/29 0.63 (0.20–1.97)
Related donor 19/50 1 0.750
Unrelated donor 14/24 1.32 (0.24–7.36)
Peripheral blood stem cells 21/55 1 0.300
Bone marrow or cord blood 12/19 2.53 (0.44–14.6)
Gut aGVHD
Low α4β7+Tregs 41/55 1 0.011
High α4β7+ Tregs 9/19 0.20 (0.06–0.69)
Myeloablative 33/45 1 0.145
Reduced intensity 17/29 0.41 (0.12–1.36)
Related donor 32/50 1 0.716
Unrelated donor 18/24 1.43 (0.21–9.69)
Peripheral blood stem cells 36/55 1 0.833
Bone marrow or cord blood 14/19 1.24 (0.17–9.16)
*

High CLA+ Tregs: CLA+ Tregs/Tregs ≥3.25%.

High α4β7+ Tregs: α4β7+ Tregs/Tregs ≥21.8%.