. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Health Psychol. 2012 Jun 11;18(4):507–517. doi: 10.1177/1359105312446769

Table 2.

Interactions between Condom Intentions and Sexual Communication Predicting Risky Sexual Behavior over Time

	UAVI			UAVI-AR
	β	Adjusted OR	95% CI	β	Adjusted OR	95% CI
Predictors
Intentions	−0.55	0.58⁺	0.33, 1.03	−1.07	0.34^*	0.14, 0.84
SexCom	−0.56	0.57	0.29, 1.12	−0.76	0.47	0.17, 1.26
Intentions X SexCom	−0.35	0.70⁺	0.47, 1.05	−1.00	0.37^*	0.16, 0.84
Control Variables
Age	−0.01	0.99	0.95, 1.03	−0.04	0.96	0.90, 1.02
Treatment Arm	0.12	1.12	0.58, 2.17	−0.45	0.64	0.23, 1.79
Baseline Sexual Behavior^a	1.98	7.21^***	3.62, 14.40	2.33	10.31^***	3.59, 29.58

Note: UAVI = unprotected sex with any partner at follow-up assessment. UAVI-AR = unprotected sex with a partner who was “at-risk” (i.e., HIV serostatus negative or unknown) at follow-up assessment. Intentions = condom use intentions. SexCom = sexual communication. Intentions and SexCom were analyzed as continuous variables.

⁺

p = .08

p < .05

^***

p < .001.

Baseline UAVI was entered in the model predicting follow-up UAVI; Baseline UAVI-AR was entered in the model predicting follow-up UAVI-AR.