Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Jan 2;25(5):706–718. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00351

Table 1.

Behavioral Categorization Results (N = 17). Mean values represent the percent of ‘goat’ responses. Values in parentheses represent standard errors of the mean.

Sentence Context
Target Type Coat-biased Goat-Biased Neutral
Ambiguous ‘goat/coat’ 60 (8) 72 (7) 66 (7)
Unambiguous ‘goat’ 100 (0) 99 (0) 98 (0)
Unambiguous ‘coat’ 1 (1) 0 (0) 0 (0)