Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 31.
Published in final edited form as: J Autism Dev Disord. 2010 Jul;40(7):787–799. doi: 10.1007/s10803-009-0926-x

Table 7.

Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values and negative predictive values of CARS cutoffs for diagnosis of ASD in a 4-year-old sample (N = 230)

CARS cut-off Sensitivity Specificity Positive predictive value Negative predictive value False positive errorsa False negative errorsa
21 0.99 0.70 0.85 0.98 25 1
21.5 0.98 0.72 0.86 0.95 23 3
22 0.97 0.74 0.87 0.92 21 5
22.5 0.95 0.77 0.88 0.89 19 8
23 0.93 0.82 0.90 0.86 15 11
23.5 0.89 0.83 0.90 0.81 14 16
24 0.88 0.87 0.92 0.80 11 18
24.5 0.86 0.93 0.96 0.80 6 20
25 0.84 0.93 0.95 0.77 6 23
25.5 0.82 0.95 0.97 0.74 4 27
26 0.81 0.95 0.97 0.74 4 28
26.5 0.78 0.98 0.98 0.71 2 32
27 0.76 1.00 1.00 0.69 0 36
27.5 0.74 1.00 1.00 0.68 0 39
28 0.71 1.00 1.00 0.66 0 42
28.5 0.69 1.00 1.00 0.64 0 46
29 0.68 1.00 1.00 0.63 0 48
29.5 0.66 1.00 1.00 0.62 0 50
a

False positive and false negative errors are reported for each CARS cutoff using diagnosis based on clinical judgment as the gold standard for diagnosis