Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 15;75(4):1007–1018. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04422.x

Table 3.

Population pharmacokinetic parameters of the final models using unbound and total concentrations of imatinib for the prediction of Cu (Model A) or Ctot (Model B)(simultaneous analysis)

Total PK Parameters Total PK parameters Unbound PK parameters Unbound PK parameters
Model A: Cu = f (Ctot)* Model B: Ctot = f (Cu)
Estimate SE (%) Estimate SE (%)§
CLtot (l h−1) 13.8 5 CLu (l h−1) 386 6
Vd,tot (l) 409 17 Vd,u (l) 9 580 20
katot (h−1) 0.80 73 kau (h−1) 0.93 70
Kd (ng ml−1) 319 2 Kd (ng ml−1) 316 3
L 11 700 L 11 700
Interindividual variability Interindividual variability
ωCL,tot (CV%)** 27 53§ ωCLu (CV%)** 25 66§
ωVd,tot (CV%)** 48 75§ ωVd,u (CV%)** 64 81§
Correlation CL-Vd 0.59 Correlation CL-Vd 0.65
Residual variability Residual variability
σ Ctot (CV%)†† 14 40§ σ Ctot (CV%)†† 15 41%§
σ Cu (CV%)†† 17 41§ σ Cu (CV%)†† 14 41%§
Correlation Cu-Ctot 0.72 Correlation Cu-Ctot 0.66
*

In this model, total PK parameters CLtot, Vd,tot and katot are estimated and Cu are predicted using:

Inline graphic (see text).

in this model, total unbound PK parameters are estimated CLu, Vd,u and kau, and Ctot are predicted using:

Inline graphic (see text).

SE, standard error of the estimates, expressed as CV%.

§

SE, standard error of the variance components, taken as square (SEestimate/estimate), expressed as a percentage.

Fixed value that represent the scaling factor that accounts for the difference in concentration unit between Ctot (ng ml−1) and total protein concentration AGP (g l−1), assuming a one-to-one molar binding ratio.

**

Estimates of variability expressed as coefficient of variation (CV%).

††

Residual variability of the plasma concentration, expressed as CV%.