Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 21;3(3):e002231. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002231

Table 3.

Two-part model: multiple logistic and multiple-linear regression analysis

Model Independent variables B coefficients Standardised regression coefficients (β) Significant p value 95% CI for B lower/upper
Multiple logistic regression Predicted variable: absence days Constant 11.039 0.000 6.14 15.93
Age −0.065 0.013 −0.116 −0.014
WAI −0.203 0.000 −0.293 −0.113
Multiple linear regression Predicted variable: number of absence days Constant 427.2* 0.000 317.32 537.08
Disability pension† −106.81* −0.52 0.000 −141.60 −72.02
WAI −4.66* −0.51 0.000 −6.13 −3.18
Age −0.498* −0.07 0.429 −1.75 0.76
Gender −10.71* −0.06 0.414 −36.82 15.40
N° of diagnoses‡ 10.24* 0.06 0.461 −17.45 37.93

The logistic regression has a Nagelkerke R=0.458, the Hosmer and Lemeshow test was not significant (p=0.09), the Omnibus test was very small (p=0.000).

For the multiple regression, the R2 was 0.724, R2 adjusted 0.7, the model is significant with p<0.001.

*Unstandardised regression coefficients (B).

†Disability pension (yes/no).

‡Number of diagnoses (up to 2/>2).