Table 5.

Results from the cognitive walk-through (n = 5)

Task	Participant 1	Participant 2	Participant 3	Participant 4	Participant 5
Task 1
Time (min)	3:59	3:58	2:05	3:53	3:31
Comments	The texts on the labels are instructive.	Used the guiding text.			Used the guiding text all the time.
Frustration comments		Starting the assessment could be confusing.	Differences between the guiding texts to the same navigation.	Must move windows to read texts in the user interface.
Navigation of system		Good with red text on the labels.
Task 2
Time (min)	5:26	3:20	4:18	4:50	5:56
Comments	The guiding texts are important. The dropdown menus are important.	The guiding texts give good instructions.	Too much space between the guiding texts. All information should be possible to see in one window.	Using the guiding texts active.	Saving should have been done automatically.
Frustration comments	The item “sensory perception” in the guideline is difficult to score. Bothersome to change windows in the system from assessment to choose interventions.	If the guiding texts gave more instructions, the dropdown menus would have been unnecessary.	Two difficult items in the assessment: physical activity and mobility.	Must move windows to read texts in the user interface.	Input data must be saved after every input.
Navigation of system	Four click for every score in the guidelines.		Four clicks for every score in the guidelines.	Changed between using the mouse and the keyboard for the same navigation.
Task 3
Time (min)	10:33	10:32	4:25	3:48	4:03
Comments	Should have been easier to find the right labels, suggested more guiding text.	When printing the care plans, dates have to be typed every time manually.
Frustration comments	There are too many windows and labels up on the screen at the same time.	Must type F4 to see the guiding text on serum albumin.
Navigation of system	Good with red text on the labels.	The guiding texts are useful.			The guiding texts are useful.