Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 2;471(5):1498–1503. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2629-4

Table 2.

Comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes among the three groups at last followup

Variable High-flexion CR (n = 47) High-flexion PS (n = 42) Standard CR (n = 48) p value
Maximal flexion (°)* 135.3 ± 7.5 133.6 ± 8.7 135.6 ± 7.0 0.41
Change in maximal flexion (°)* 2.2 ± 9.9 1.4 ± 12.1 3.5 ± 11.1 0.30
Kneeling (number of patients) 22 (42%) 20 (48%) 24 (50%) 0.86
Crossleg squatting (number of patients) 35 (74%) 30 (71%) 38 (79%) 0.73
Knee Society score (points)*
 Pain 44.0 ± 6.0 42.0 ± 8.3 44.6 ± 7.2 0.22
 Function 89.0 ± 9.8 90.1 ± 8.3 89.7 ± 11.1 0.87
WOMAC score (points)* 20.0 ± 12.5 23.6 ± 11.5 20.5 ± 12.0 0.36
Radiolucent line (number of knees)
 Femoral component 0.82
  Zone 1 5 5 5
  Zone 4 1
 Tibial component 0.58
  Zone 1 4 4 2

* Values are expressed as mean ± SD; CR = PCL retaining; PS = PCL substituting.