Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr;202(4):301–306. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.104711

Table 2.

Proportion of participants in the rapid- v. non-rapid-cycling group with treatment-emergent hypomaniaa

Rapid-cycling group (n = 25)
Non-rapid-cycling group (n = 56)
n % (95% exact CI) n % (95% exact CI) P b
Hypomania 5 20.0 (6.8–40.7) 5 8.9 (3.0–19.6) 0.27

Type I subsyndromal 5 20.0 (6.8–40.7) 10 17.9 (8.9–30.4) 0.82

Type II subsyndromal 2 8.0 (1.0–26.0) 5 8.9 (3.0–19.6) 0.89

Type III subsyndromal 2 8.0 (1.0–26.0) 13 23.2 (13.0–36.4) 0.13

Hypomania or type I 10 40.0 (21.1–61.3) 15 26.8 (15.8–40.3) 0.30

Hypomania or type I or type II 11 44.0 (24.4–65.1) 18 32.1 (20.3–46.0) 0.33

Hypomania or type I or type II or type III 11 44.0 (24.4–65.1) 26 46.4 (33.0–60.3) 0.99
a

Some patients had more than one subsyndromal episode. Thus, the number of patients experiencing an episode shown in Table 2 may be smaller than the total number of episodes shown in Table 3.

b

Fisher's exact test for comparison of rapid- v. non-rapid-cycling groups.