Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 18;2013:869214. doi: 10.1155/2013/869214

Table 3.

Published EUS-CP series on intrahepatic (left) biliary tree drainage (involving ≥5 patients).

Year Author N Indication Initial ERCP Techniques Technical success Clinical Success Complication
2006 Kahaleh et al. [28] 13 Both Sb 11 R*; 1 T 12/13 (92.3%) 12/12 (100%) 1/13 (7.7%)
2007 Bories et al. [38] 11 Both Sb T 10/11 (91%) 10/10 (100%) 4/11 (36%)
2007 Will et al. [7] 10# Both Sb T 9/10 (90%) 8/9 (88.9%) 1/8 (12.5%)
2009 Maranki et al. [12] 35 Both Sb (mostly) 24 R; 3 T; 2 A 29/35 (83%) 29/35 (83%) 5/35 (14.3%)
2009 Horaguchi et al. [14] 7 M Sb T 7/7 (100%) 6/7 (86%) 1/7 (14.3%)
2011 Park do et al. [11] 31 Both Sm T 31/31 (100%) 27/31 (87%) 5/31 (16%)
2011 Weilert et al. [39] 6 B n/a 4 A; 2 R 6/6 (100%) 6/6 (100%) 1/6 (17%)
2012 Iwashita et al. [36] 9 Both Sm R 4/9 (44%) 4/4 (100%) 1/9 (11%)

Total 123 63 T; 46 R; 6 A 109/123 (88.6%) 103/109 (94.5%) 19/123 (15%)

EUS-CP: endoscopic-ultrasound-guided cholangiopancreatography, N: number of patients, B: benign, M: malignant, Sb: subsequent day, Sm: same day/session, D: ductography, T: transluminal, R: rendezvous, A: antegrade, n/a: not applicable/mentioned. *In few cases stents might have been placed antegrade. #10 interventions in 8 patients.