Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 2;7(1):85–91. doi: 10.1007/s13181-010-0130-6

Table 1.

Demographic information of participants in follow-up assessment compared with those who sought medical care for chlorine exposure identified during the rapid assessment after the train derailment

Demographic information Follow-up assessment (n = 94) Rapid assessment (n = 605)a
n (%) n (%)
Age (in years)
Mean 41 36
Range 2–81 <1–85
Sex
Male 60 (63.8) 332 (58.8)
Female 34 (36.2) 233 (41.2)
Race/ethnicity
White 65 (69.2) 255 (59.9)
Black 27 (28.7) 150 (35.2)
Hispanic 1 (1.1) 11 (2.6)
Otherb 1 (1.1) 10 (2.4)
Patient categoryc
Graniteville resident 38 (40.4) 110 (33.2)
Worker at mill 24 (25.5) 103 (31.1)
Resident of contiguous town 10 (10.6) 23 (7.0)
In vehicle close to site 8 (8.5) 36 (10.9)
Resident of noncontiguous town 4 (4.3) 19 (5.7)
Rescue worker 4 (4.3) 12 (3.6)
In vehicle farther from site 3 (3.2) 21 (6.3)
Other 3 (3.2) 7 (2.1)
Exposure severity rating
Moderate-to-extreme exposure 45 (47.9) 145 (49.7)
No or low exposure 49 (52.1) 147 (50.3)
Medical outcome
Severe medical outcome 15 (16.0) 51 (8.4)
Less severe medical outcome 79 (84.0) 544 (91.6)

aBecause of missing data, percentages are based on the following sample sizes: sex, 565; race/ethnicity, 426, patient category, 331; exposure severity rating, 292

bOther responses for race/ethnicity included Native American, Pacific Islander, Indian, and multiracial or ethnic backgrounds

cPatient category describes where the person was at the time of exposure. Night-shift mill workers were categorized as “worker at mill,” even if they lived in Graniteville. Day-shift mill workers who lived in Graniteville were categorized as “Graniteville residents”