Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 2.
Published in final edited form as: Med Care. 2009 Jul;47(7):749–757. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819748b3

Table 3.

Multivariate analyses

Census Sample (N = 1000)

Dependent Variable = lymph node dissection OR SE p
Surgical Treatment
 Breast Conserving Surgery 0.02 0.01 0.000
 Mastectomy/Reconstruction
  Referent 1.00
  Implant 0.58 0.21 0.13
  Autogenous 3.71 2.02 0.02
  Unknown 3.67 3.85 0.22

Census Tract
 Percent below poverty 0.98 0.009 0.04

Site * Treatment Interactions
 BCS 0.20 0.12 0.007
 Mastectomy with autogenous reconstuction 0.12 0.08 0.003

Calendar Time
 Year 0.44 0.08 0.000
 Year^2 1.04 0.01 0.000

Site
 Site * Year < 1995 (early period) 3.57 2.05 0.026
 Site * Year > 1994 (late period) 1.19 0.45 0.64

Insurance Coverage (Referent = Medicare)
 Private*Φ(1− ((t−1995)/2) (early period) 3.36 1.36 0.003
 Private*Φ((t−1995)/2) (late period) 1.27 0.51 0.55
  (Private+Medicare)*(1−Φ((t−1997)/1.2) (early period) 4.25 2.43 0.01
  (Private+Medicare)* Φ((t−1997)/1.2) (late period) 0.63 0.39 0.45
 Medicaid/uninsured/other 0.90 0.76 0.90
 Unknown 1.18 0.59 0.75

Goodness of Fit Statistics
Wald test of Significance of Model 311.480 0.000
Pseudo R2 0.555
C-Stat 0.942
Hosmer-Lemeshow, 20 groups, chi2(18) 12.250 0.834