Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 2;8(4):e59973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059973

Table 1. Evaluation of the device’s ability to provide the required FIO2.

A.
Desired FIO2 21% 18% 15% 12% 9% 6%
Actual FIO2 (%) 20.6 ± 0.1 17.5 ± 0.3 14.6 ± 0.2 11.8 ± 0.2 8.8 ± 0.2 5.9 ± 0.3
B.
FIO2 to reach 18 ± 1 % 15 ± 1 % 12 ± 1 % 9 ± 1 % 6 ± 1 %
Time to reach the FIO2 4.08 ± 0.9 s* 10.6 ± 0 s 9.12 ± 1 s 9.78 ± 0.9 s 14.84 ± 4.2 s*

A) Evaluation of actual inspiratory fraction of oxygen (FIO2) for the different FIO2 values tested. Values are expressed as mean ± SD.

B) Time necessary to reach a stable composition (± 1%) for the different FIO2 values tested.

ANOVA on ranks was used as the statistical test. Values are expressed as mean ± SD. p values were < 0.05;

*

Indicates significant difference (p<0.001) between the time to reach 18 ± 1 % and 6 ± 1%.