Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan;86(1021):20120221. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20120221

Table 3. Factors associated with liver MRI–CT image fusion discrepancy >5 mm of any validation point.

Variables No. of patients No. of patients with fusion discrepancy >5 mm (%) p-value
Sex
 Male 47 24 (51.0) 0.672
 Female 6 4 (66.7)
ECOG performance
 0–1 46 24 (51.1) 0.234
 ≥2 7 4 (57.1)
Child–Pugh classification
 A 43 21 (48.8) 0.172
 B–C 10 7 (70.0)
LN metastasis
 Positive 8 4 (50.0) 1.000
 Negative 45 24 (53.3)
Distant metastasis
 Positive 7 2 (28.6) 0.234
 Negative 46 26 (56.5)
Tumour size
 <10 cm 41 21 (51.2) 0.750
 ≥10 cm 12 7 (58.3)
Number of tumours
 Solitary 25 14 (56.0) 0.785
 Multiple 28 14 (50.0)
Ascites
 Positive 12 10 (83.3) 0.022
 Negative 39 18 (43.9)
Pulmonary disease
 Positive 8 7 (87.5) 0.053
 Negative 45 21 (46.7)
Ascites or pulmonary disease
 Positive 18 16 (88.9) <0.001
 Negative 35 12 (34.3)

ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; LN, lymph node.