Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 3.

Published in final edited form as: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 Nov 1;166(11):1030–1036. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.1263

Table 2.

Comparison of Prevalence MetS_HOMA and Met_SIFG by Gender and Weight Group

	MetS_HOMA			MetS_IFG
	Male (n=538)	Female (n=647)	Total (n=1185)	Male (n=538)	Female (n=647)	Total (n=1185)
Total (%)^a	94 (7.5%)	85 (13.1%)	179 (15.1%)	66 (12.3%)	46 (7.1%)	112 (9.5%)

Healthy Weight (%)	0 (0%)	1 (1.5%)	1 (0.3%)	0 (0%)	1 (0.5%)	1 (0.3%)
Overweight (%)^a	9 (6.0%)	14 (5.9%)	23 (5.9%)	4 (2.7%)	6 (2.5%)	10 (2.6%)
Obese (%)^a	85 (35.9%)	70 (34.1%)	155 (35.1%)	62 (26.2%)	39 (19.0%)	101 (22.9%)

^a

Indicates significant differences in prevalence between MetS_HOMA and MetS_IFG for total and gender groups separately.