Table 3.
Replaced | Summed | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|
Linear | |||
Percentage of cells | 39% (111) | 61% (171) | |
Percentage lagging | 58% (64) | 30% (66) | 0.01 |
Mean delay | -49 ms | 13 ms | <0.001 |
Median delay | -70 ms | 30 ms | <0.001 |
Logistic | |||
Percentage of cells | 36% (108) | 64% (194) | |
Percentage lagging | 56% (61) | 43% (83) | 0.02 |
Mean delay | -116 ms | -11 ms | 0.01 |
Median delay | -140 ms | -10 ms | 0.03 |
The top rows list the percentage (and number) of cells better “Replaced” or better “Summed,” while the subsequent rows show the percentage of those cells with a lagging delay, the mean delay, and median delay. The percentages were compared using a chi-square test, the mean delays were compared with a t-test, and the median delays were compared with a Wilcoxon rank-sum test.