Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr;25(2):154–160. doi: 10.1089/acu.2013.0965

Table 2.

Clinical Pain Response of HPS and LPS Groups to TA and SA

 
 
 
 
95% CI
Change in clinical pain (post-treatment minus pretreatment) LPS HPS p-Value Lower Upper
SA group
 SF MPQ Total −2.14(6.68) −8.65(7.91) 0.027* 0.81 12.19
 SF MPQ Sensory −1.21(4.58) −6.79(6.76) 0.017* 1.09 10.05
 SF MPQ Affective −0.93(2.70) −1.86(1.79) 0.29 −0.85 2.71
 VAS −0.19(1.53) −1.71(2.59) 0.07 −0.13 3.17
TA group
 SF MPQ Total −6.90(4.51) −6.42(9.26) 0.88 −7.18 6.22
 SF MPQ Sensory −5.10(3.63) −5.17(8.13) 0.98 −5.74 5.88
 SF MPQ Affective −1.80(1.23) −1.25(1.71) 0.41 −1.90 0.80
 VAS −0.67(1.71) −0.13(2.02) 0.52 −2.22 1.15
*

p-Value<0.05 for t-test comparing change in clinical pain for HPS vs LPS.

HPS, high pain sensitivity; LPS, low pain sensitivity; TA, traditional acupuncture; SA, sham acupuncture; SF MPQ, Short Form of McGill Pain Questionnaire; VAS, visual analogue scale.