Table 1.
Author | Patients | Surgical technique | Results | Complications |
---|---|---|---|---|
Akbarnia et al. [26] | 16 patients | XLIF plus posterior instrumentation in patients with coronal Cobb angle >30° | Anterior corrected 45 % of coronal deformity After posterior surgery, 64 % correction (coronal) Average sagittal improvement 13° VAS 6.5–2.5 ODI 60–24 |
50 % postoperative anterior thigh pain (all transient) Sensory disturbances in 56 % (12 % permanent) Weakness in 12 %, all transient |
Tormenti et al. [27] | 8 patients | Multilevel XLIF plus posterior instrumentation | 2 motor deficits (one permanent) 6 sensory deficits (5 permanent) One bowel perforation One infection causing meningitis and sepsis One pulmonary embolism One dural tear (in the posterior approach) |
|
Dakwar et al. [28] | 25 patients | Most XLIF plus lateral plate | One-third of patients did not obtain a good sagittal alignment | One implant failure One cage subsidence Transient anterior thigh numbness in 12 % One case of rhabdomyolysis |
Wang et al. [29] | 23 patients | XLIF plus percutaneous pedicle screws | Cobb angle corrected from 31° to 10° | Thigh dysesthesia, pain or weakness in 30 %, permanent in one patient No other complications were observed |
Keshavarzi et al. [30] | 26 patients | Staged XLIF plus posterior instrumentation | Mean correction from 47° to 28° (coronal) after anterior surgery, then to 13° after posterior instrumentation L1–L5 lordosis from 32° to 49° after anterior surgery, then to 51° after posterior After anterior surgery, coronal decompensation that needed correction with posterior instrumentation |
Complications not included in the report |
Phillips and Kahn [31] | 90 patients | Stand alone or bilateral posterior pedicle instrumentation | Stand alone corrected less (9.8 %) than anterior plus posterior bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation (41.5 %) Open pedicle screw instrumentation corrected more than percutaneous |
|
Isaacs et al. [32] | 107 patients | Stand alone, XLIF plus lateral plating, XLIF plus percutaneous or open pedicle screw instrumentation | Major complications were more frequent in open posterior instrumentation (20.7 %) than in percutaneous posterior instrumentation (5.8 %) One kidney laceration No major vascular, intestinal or ureteral complications were seen Seven patients had severe or protracted motor deficit (2 of them only after posterior staged surgery) |