Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 29.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 19;61(4):447–454. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.10.028

Table 3.

Association Between Indices of LV function and R-R Variation or CAN at EDIC Year 16 to 17 After Adjustment for Traditional Cardiac Risk Factors and Glycemia

Cardiac Function Normal R-R
(n = 649)
Abnormal R-R
(n = 315)
p Value CAN–
(n = 595)
CAN+
(n = 371)
p Value
End-diastolic volume, ml 135.9 ± 1.4 137.7 ± 1.6 0.2866 136.3 ± 1.4 136.8 ± 1.5 0.7277
End-systolic volume, ml 52.9 ± 0.9 53.2 ± 1.0 0.7922 53.3 ± 0.9 52.7 ± 1.0 0.5856
Stroke volume, ml 82.9 ± 0.9 84.4 ± 1.0 0.1662 83.0 ± 0.9 84.1 ± 1.0 0.2858
Ejection fraction, % 61.5 ± 0.4 61.9 ± 0.4 0.3656 61.4 ± 0.4 62.0 ± 0.4 0.1652
Cardiac output, l/min 5.8 ± 0.1 6.2 ± 0.1 <0.0001 5.8 ± 0.1 6.1 ± 0.1 0.0003
LV mass, gm 140.3 ± 1.3 143.6 ± 1.5 0.0352 140.7 ± 1.3 142.6 ± 1.4 0.2155
Mass-to-volume ratio, gm/ml 1.04 ± 0.01 1.06 ± 0.01 0.2490 1.04 ± 0.01 1.05 ± 0.01 0.3499

Values are least square mean ± SE, adjusted for concurrent age, sex, cohort assignment (primary/secondary), machine type, height, weight, current smoking, current alcohol use, mean SBP, mean HDL, mean LDL, and mean HbA1c. CAN+ included RR variation <20 plus Valsalva ratio <1.5 or a decrease of >10 mm Hg in DBP upon standing as defined in Methods.

Abbreviations as in Tables 1 and 2.