Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Biol Chem. 2007 Nov 8;283(3):1401–1410. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M703831200

TABLE 2.

Effect of PEP-19, PEP(28–62), and PEP(39–62) on calcium binding affinity and cooperativity

The macroscopic dissociation constants were derived as described in Material and Methods. All values are the average mean ± S.E. of (n) independent titrations. The square root of the product of macroscopic dissociation constants for each domain is equivalent to the KCa50 for binding to each domain. The precision of this value is greater than the individual dissociation constants. The overall decrease in free energy from binding two Ca2+ ions to the N- or C-domains (ΔGtot) was calculated as ΔGtot = −RT ln(K1×K2). The upper limit for the change in free energy due to cooperative Ca2+ binding (ΔΔGc) was calculated as ΔΔGc = −RT ln(4 × K2/K1). Free energy values are in kcal/mole.

N C-Domain
N-Domain
Macroscopic Kd (μM)
ΔGtot ΔΔGc Macroscopic Kd (μM)
ΔGtot ΔΔGc
Kd1 Kd2
Kd1Kd2
Kd3 Kd4
Kd3Kd4
CaM (15) 17 ± 3 0.4 ± 0.1 2.2 ± 0.2 −15.3 ± 0.3 −3.4 ± 0.3 34 ± 4 6.2 ± 1 13.1 ± 1.0 −13.3 ± 0.1 −1.9 ± 0.2
CaM + PEP-19 (6) 4.7 ± 1 2.0 ± 0.2 2.8 ± 0.2 −15.0 ± 0.1 −1.3 ± 0.2 35 ± 6 3.9 ± 0.6 14.0 ± 1.0 −13.2 ± 0.1 −2.3 ± 0.2
CaM + PEP(28–62) (3) 5.0 ± 1.3 1.7 ± 0.3 2.8 ± 0.1 −15.0 ± 0.1 −1.4 ± 0.3 57 ± 25 4.1 ± 1.4 13.1 ± 0.5 −13.2 ± 0.1 −2.3 ± 0.5
CaM + PEP(39–62) (3) 1.4 ± 0.3 0.4 ± 0.1 0.7 ± 0.1 −16.6 ± 0.1 −1.6 ± 0.3 36 ± 1 2.6 ± 1.0 8.6 ± 0.7 −13.7 ± 0.1 −2.4 ± 0.4